Golf influencer Paige Spiranac weighed in on Rory McIlroy’s recent refusal to engage with the media during major tournaments, and her support has triggered mixed reactions across the golf community.
McIlroy, fresh off his Masters victory and a solid finish at the U.S. Open, skipped media duties after a disappointing first round at Oakmont and during the driver controversy at Quail Hollow. Instead of taking questions, he opted to speak through social media or address things later—decisions that angered some pundits.
In response, Spiranac took to X to offer what she called a “hot take.” She defended McIlroy’s actions, writing that athletes are not required to speak to reporters, especially when scrutiny and criticism are relentless. She argued that the public sees only the athlete’s performance, not the emotional or physical toll they endure behind the scenes .
“A hot take but I don’t care when athletes do this,” Spiranac added after the U.S. Open, noting that fans should be more sympathetic: “He gave us everything on the course… cut him a break”. She emphasized empathy, recognizing that after years of openness, McIlroy is not obligated to continually face probing questions—especially during troubling periods.
Her commentary has polarized fans. Many praised her defense, applauding Spiranac for supporting McIlroy amid aggressive scrutiny and respecting his decision to protect his mental state. On Reddit, one user said:
“I think he’s been around long enough that he’s earned the right to storm off after losing in a Major… Last thing I’d want to do is answer stupid questions.”
Others, however, disagree. Critics argue that McIlroy is part of a public profession; handling media is integral to his role. They believe avoiding interviews can appear unprofessional and lacking in sportsmanship.
Spiranac’s support underscores a broader cultural shift in sports—moving from the traditional expectation of athlete availability to a focus on mental well‑being and athlete autonomy. Many believe it’s fair for athletes to pick when they engage with press. Others see that looming as a slide toward narcissism and detachment from fans.
Spiranac herself has been no stranger to controversy. She previously weighed in on course etiquette, media bans, and LIV Golf, often generating passionate responses. Her backing of McIlroy here continues that pattern—speaking up on contentious topics and prompting strong reactions.
As the debate simmers, the big question remains: Should top athletes like McIlroy have the right to avoid media duties when they choose? Or is media access a responsibility they owe to fans and sponsors? Fans appear split—some siding with McIlroy and Spiranac, while others feel it’s an abandonment of duty.
What’s clear is that this episode isn’t just about one golfer or incident—it’s a flashpoint in a wider discussion on mental health, athlete autonomy, and the evolving relationship between sports stars and the media.